Review and revise existing national legislation | |
The review should look for gaps and how existing legislation and policy support the implementation of the instruments. A review should not only focus on the existence of national legislation but also encompass its enforcement. |
|
Plan implementation by following the national consultation process | |
Consult with different relevant actors at the national level, including other ministries and technical/scientific experts as well as NFPs of other relevant MEAs |
|
The process should be open, transparent and inclusive in order to develop ownership and legitimacy for the plans implementation |
|
Establish or join existing national committee for implementation of migratory species conservation needs | |
Develop National Strategies and/or implementation plans | |
For the development of a National Strategy and/or Implementation Plan the following three options could be considered: 1. Full integration of Migratory Species into the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) 2. Stand-alone National Implementation Plan for Migratory Species (NIP) 3. Combination of NBSAP and NIP Whichever option is chosen, it is clear that an effective strategy can only be elaborated through a consultative process with full involvement of all relevant stakeholders. |
|
Promote and collaborate to actively support implementation on the ground | |
Link decision-making with implementation on the ground | |
Improve national capacity-building plans for the implementation of the CMS and its instruments (e.g. communication and awareness raising) |
|
Review of national resources available for implementation | |
Secure additional financial and other resources for the implementation | |
Explore enacting a national strategy and/or implementation strategy into law | |
Develop enforcement and compliance frameworks | |
Monitor, and assess and report on national implementation | |
National strategies and/or plans should include review, monitoring and evaluation of a countries implementation activities in order to determine whether the CMS and its instruments are bringing about tangible improvement and that obligations under the instruments are being met. |
|
Promote transboundary and regional Implementation and implementation at the international level |
|
Engage international processes such as UNDAFs and GEF |
Documents:
CMS Instruments: